Legal Opinion

Ruth v. Cherokee Funding, LLC

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 22, 2018No. S17G2021PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Blackwell, Justice.

**574In Cherokee Funding v. Ruth, 342 Ga. App. 404, 802 S.E.2d 865 (2017), our Court of Appeals decided that neither the Industrial Loan Act, OCGA § 7-3-1 et seq., nor the *707Payday Lending Act, OCGA § 16-17-1 et seq.,1 applies to certain transactions in which a financing company provides funds to a plaintiff in a pending personal-injury lawsuit, the plaintiff is obligated to repay the funds with interest only if his lawsuit is successful, and his obligation to repay is limited to the extent of the damages that he recovers in the lawsuit. We granted a petition for a writ of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Deal v. ColemanSupreme Court of Georgia · 2013
  2. Anglo-Dutch Petroleum International, Inc. v. Haskell, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2006
  3. Walton Guano Co. v. CopelanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  4. Pope v. MarshallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887
  5. City of Marietta v. SummerourSupreme Court of Georgia · 2017

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lizzie Davis v. Oasis Legal Finance Operating Company, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
  2. DIXON Et Al. v. BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2019
  3. JACKSON v. RAFFENSPERGERSupreme Court of Georgia · 2020
  4. DIXON Et Al. v. BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2019
  5. Orubo v. Activehours, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2025

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API