Legal Opinion
JACKSON v. RAFFENSPERGER
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided May 18, 2020No. S20A0039PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
308 Ga. 736
FINAL COPY S20A0039. JACKSON et al. v. RAFFENSPERGER. BOGGS, Justice. In June 2018, Mary Jackson and her non-profit organization, Reaching Our Sisters Everywhere, Inc. (“ROSE”), filed a complaint against the Secretary of State challenging the constitutionality of the Georgia Lactation Consultant Practice Act (the “Act”), OCGA §§ 43-22A-1 to 43-22A-13, which prohibits the practice of “lactation care and services” for compensation without a license from the Secretary of State. Specifically, Jackson and ROSE (collectively, “Appellants”) allege that, under the Act, they are ineligible…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Bell v. AustinSupreme Court of Georgia · 2005
- Jenkins v. ManrySupreme Court of Georgia · 1961
- Bramley v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- Gregory v. QuarlesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
- Southeastern Electric Co. v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1932
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In the Matter of Christopher John PalazzolaSupreme Court of Georgia · 2020
- RAFFENSPERGER v. JACKSON (And Vice Versa)Supreme Court of Georgia · 2023
- In the Matter of Susan Michele BrownSupreme Court of Georgia · 2024
- In the Matter of Christian Aaron CoomerSupreme Court of Georgia · 2024
- Conservatorship of Eric B.California Supreme Court · 2022
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.