Kearl v. Lederle Laboratories
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SABRAW, J.
Defendant, Lederle Laboratories, appeals from a judgment for plaintiff after a jury determined defendant’s polio vaccine was defective and caused plaintiff to contract that disease. We reverse the judgment.
Although defendant raises numerous grounds for reversal—erroneous evidentiary rulings, misconduct on the part of the trial judge, inconsistency of verdicts, denial of due process, and erroneous application of strict products liability law to the facts of this case—we need address only the latter issue here, We hold that although in standard products liability litigation a…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1963
- Barker v. Lull Engineering Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
- Escola v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
- Payton v. Abbott LabsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
- Sindell v. Abbott LaboratoriesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Merrill v. Navegar, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Bruesewitz v. Wyeth LLCSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Brown v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- prod.liab.rep.(cch)p 11,422 Harry Plummer, Cross-Appellant v. Lederle Laboratories, Division of American Cyanamid Company, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Toner v. Lederle LaboratoriesIdaho Supreme Court · 1987
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.