Legal Opinion

Hanson v. the Underhill

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 4, 1910No. Civ. No. 731PublishedCited by 5 opinions

APPLICATION for writ of mandate to the auditor of San Mateo County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtCooper, P. J.

This is an application for a writ of mandate to compel the defendant, as auditor of San Mateo county, to draw a warrant upon the county treasurer for the payment of $66.66, claimed to be due petitioner as salary as deputy recorder of said county for the month of September, 1909. A demurrer has been interposed to the petition; and at the argument it was conceded that the facts stated in the petition are true, and that the question for determination is a question of law" as to whether or not the petition states facts sufficient to entitle petitioner to any relief.

It appears that at the November…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Doughterty v. AustinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Tulare County v. MayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Daggett v. Ford CountyIllinois Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Humiston v. ShafferCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Newman v. LesterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gallarno v. LongSupreme Court of Iowa · 1932
  2. County of Calaveras v. PoeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Wines v. GarrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  4. McFadden v. BordenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
  5. Elder v. GareyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API