Leeper v. Nelson
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtAshburn, J.
Defendant Nelson appeals from a judgment for $1,060.97 rendered in favor of both plaintiffs, Harrison D. Leeper and Gaynell Leeper, after a nonjury trial. Findings were waived.
Appellant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence. In such ease, “The appellate court’s function begins and ends with a determination as to whether or not there is any substantial evidence which will support the findings of the trier of fact.” (Guardianship of Kentera, 41 Cal.2d 639, 645 [262 P.2d 317].) The evidence must be viewed most favorably to the judge’s implied findings (Estate of Reed, 132 Cal.App.2d 732,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Freeman v. ChurchillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Huetter v. AndrewsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Jaeger v. ChapmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Caswell v. CaswellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Murphy v. AblowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bach v. County of ButteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Lanegan v. CraufordWashington Supreme Court · 1956
- Beck v. KesslerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Altvater v. BreckenridgeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Philo v. LanciaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.