Legal Opinion
State v. Bomar
Montana Supreme Court
Decided March 18, 2008No. DA 06-0258PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Gray
¶1 Larry Bomar appeals from the judgment entered by the Ninth Judicial District Court, Glacier County, upon a jury verdict convicting him of the felony offense of sexual assault, and from its subsequent order denying his motion for a new trial. We affirm.
¶2 The restated issues on appeal are:
¶3 1. Did the District Court err in denying Bomar’s motions for
dismissal and a new trial based on insufficiency of the evidence?
¶4 2. Did the District Court err in admitting expert testimony regarding the validity of the statements by a child witness contained in a law enforcement officer’s report?
BACKGROUN…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Hulse v. State, Department of JusticeMontana Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. AriegweMontana Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. SwannMontana Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. HicksMontana Supreme Court · 2006
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- State v. PassmoreMontana Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. CharlieMontana Supreme Court · 2010
- Bomar v. State of MTMontana Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. TorgersonMontana Supreme Court · 2008
- In re M.B.Montana Supreme Court · 2009
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.