Legal Opinion
Bomar v. State of MT
Montana Supreme Court
Decided July 31, 2012No. DA 11-0373PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rice
¶1 Larry Bomar (Bomar) appeals from the order of the Ninth Judicial District Court, Glacier County, dismissing his petition for postconviction relief, which alleged ineffective assistance of his trial counsel. We affirm and address the following issue:
¶2 Did the District Court err by dismissing Bomar’s postconviction petition?
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
¶3 In 2005, Bomar was charged with attempted sexual intercourse without consent and sexual assault, both felonies, upon K.J. The crimes were alleged to have occurred in 2000, when K. J. was six years old. K.J. was twelve years old at the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Yarborough v. GentrySupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Whitlow v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2008
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- State v. ColburnMontana Supreme Court · 2018
- State v. PetersonMontana Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. BekemansMontana Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. MacGregorMontana Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. RootMontana Supreme Court · 2015
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.