Legal Opinion

In re M.B.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 2009No. DA 08-0443PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Nelson

¶1 Appellants Roberta and Thomas Rawson (the Rawsons), Intervenors in these three consolidated causes of action, appeal from the final judgment and order of the Second Judicial District, Silver Bow County, denying Intervenors’ motion for new trials or for amended judgments and denying. Intervenors’ motion to stay the judgments. We affirm.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

¶2 In December 2006, the Department of Public Health and Human Services (DPHHS) filed a petition for emergency protective services, adjudication as youths in need of care and temporary legal custody for two children,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In re T.E.Montana Supreme Court · 2002
  2. In re Declaring S.P.Montana Supreme Court · 1990
  3. In re T.S.B.Montana Supreme Court · 2008
  4. In re C.H.Montana Supreme Court · 2000
  5. State v. BomarMontana Supreme Court · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. In re T.S.W.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2012
  2. In re J.W.C.Montana Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Dept. of Human Services v. R. F.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
  4. In re J.J.Montana Supreme Court · 2018
  5. In re B.W.S.Montana Supreme Court · 2016

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API