Legal Opinion
Rosenberg v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp.
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 9, 1979PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Shanley N. Egeth, J.
The defendant Pittsburgh Corning Corporation (Corning) moves for an order dismissing the cross claim interposed against it by a codefendant Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. (Raybestos) upon the grounds that the attorneys who have appeared in the action on behalf of Raybestos are not authorized to practice law in this State and have no capacity to represent any client in New York litigation. Raybestos has cross-moved for an order pursuant to 22 NYCRR 520.8 (e) admitting an employee of its attorneys, Kathleen F. Moran, Esq., to practice in New York pro hac vice,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In re the Application of TangAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
- Park Lane Commercial Corp. v. Travelers Indemnity Co.New York Supreme Court · 1966
- In re BehrleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
3Cited by5 opinions
- Schoenefeld v. State of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
- Neal v. Energy Transportation Group, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- White River Paper Co. v. Ashmont Tissue, Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1981
- Lichtenstein v. EmersonNew York Supreme Court · 1997
- Schoenefeld v. SchneidermanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016