Legal Opinion

Park Lane Commercial Corp. v. Travelers Indemnity Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 18, 1966PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtIrving H. Saypol, J.

Motion is denied. Defendants Travel Holiday Tours, Ltd., and Henry Fennell move for a protective order (CPLR 3103, subd. [a]), by their attorney, whose office *232and post office address is in Jersey City, New Jersey. The question arises whether such representation is valid.

Section 470 of the Judiciary Law provides that a person regularly admitted to practice as an attorney and counselor in the courts of record of this State whose office for the transaction of business is within the State may practice as such. Upon giving up his office here, he loses his right to practice (Matter of Fordan, 5…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re the Estate of FordanNew York Surrogate's Court · 1956

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re the Application of TangAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
  2. White River Paper Co. v. Ashmont Tissue, Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1981
  3. Lichtenstein v. EmersonNew York Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Rosenberg v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API