Legal Opinion
In re the Application of Tang
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 6, 1972PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSteuer, J.
The motion, brought by an applicant for admission to the Bar, asks that this court authorize the Committee on Character and Fitness to certify him as qualified for admission. Strictly speaking the relief asked for is unnecessary, the committee being already authorized to make such a certification . whenever in its judgment such action is warranted. What petitioner really wants is a direction to the committee to the effect that the facts as to his residence do not disqualify him. While it is not the practice of this court to give directions to the committee as to how it shall resolve any…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In re the Estate of FordanNew York Surrogate's Court · 1956
- Park Lane Commercial Corp. v. Travelers Indemnity Co.New York Supreme Court · 1966
- In re ScharfAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
3Cited by13 opinions
- Clifton C. Tang v. Appellate Division of the New York Supreme Court, First Department, and Honorable Justices Aron SteuerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1974
- In re GordonNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Schoenefeld v. State of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
- Canfield v. Wisconsin Board of Attorneys Professional CompetenceDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1980
- White River Paper Co. v. Ashmont Tissue, Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1981
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.