Legal Opinion
California MacHinery & Supply Co. v. University City Syndicate, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 31, 1934No. Civ. 9829PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIS, J., pro tem.
The motion to strike the bill of exceptions must be denied. This in turn requires a denial of the motion to dismiss the appeal from or to affirm the second judgment, as this latter motion is predicated on a granting of the first.
In ruling on a motion for new trial addressed to the decision and judgment based thereon first filed and entered in this case, the trial court under authority of section 662 of the Code of Civil Procedure changed and added to its findings and conclusions in a material and substantial respect, and a modified judgment was entered in accordance…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Tupman v. HaberkernCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Klauber v. San Diego Street Car Co.California Supreme Court · 1893
- Estate of CaldwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Holland v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Postal Telegraph-Cable Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- George v. Bekins Van & Storage Co.California Court of Appeal · 1948
- Blache v. BlacheCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- Oliver v. BoxleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Pelletier v. EisenbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- City of Burbank v. NordahlCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.