Legal Opinion
Pelletier v. Eisenberg
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 11, 1986No. D002200PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WORK, J.
A. John Pelletier sued Jerome M. Eisenberg, Betty Eisenberg and The Galleries at La Jolla (owned by the Eisenbergs) (hereafter referred to collectively as Eisenbergs) for conversion, breach of trust, and damage to and destruction of fine art. (Civ. Code, § 1738 et seq.) The jury returned a verdict in favor of Pelletier. The Eisenbergs were granted a new trial limited to the measure of damages for the loss of the paintings and the damages assessed for Pelletier’s pursuit of converted insurance proceeds. After the court granted the Eisenbergs a new trial, Pelletier moved for a…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Brewer v. Second Baptist ChurchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Liodas v. SahadiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Hamasaki v. FlothoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Heninger v. DunnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Woodcock v. Fontana Scaffolding & Equipment Co.California Supreme Court · 1968
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Stewart v. Truck Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Ayyad v. Sprint SpectrumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- People v. First Federal Credit Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2002
- Hand Electronics, Inc. v. Snowline Joint Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.