Legal Opinion

Tillery v. Fuller

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided May 30, 1938No. 34674PublishedCited by 66 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

O’NIELL, Chief Justice.

These cases are petitory actions. They were consolidated and tried as one suit because each suit is for a fractional interest in either all or a part of the same tract of land. The land has an area of 240 acres, is composed of the S.½ of S.E.¼ of Section' 11, N.½ of N.E.¼ of Section 14, and W.½ of N.W.¼, of Section 13, in T. 23 N., R. 16 W., and is in the Rodessa oil field, in Caddo parish.

For an understanding of the relative positions of the three 80-acre tracts we must have in mind that the three sections are regular sections, in place, so that Section 11 is on .the…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Houghton v. HallSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1933
  2. Harang v. Golden Ranch Land & Drainage Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1918
  3. Heirs v. MartinezSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1910
  4. Ashley Co. v. BradfordSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1902
  5. Bendernagel v. ForetSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1919

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by66 opinions

  1. Tyson v. SpearmanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1938
  2. Lee v. JonesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1953
  3. Knapp v. Jefferson-Plaquemines Drainage Dist.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1953
  4. Yuges Realty, Ltd. v. Jefferson Parish Developers, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1944
  5. Quatre Parish Co. v. Beauregard Parish School BoardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1952

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API