Legal Opinion
Autoalliance International, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided August 30, 2005No. Slip Op. 05-115; Court 01-01070PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CARMAN, Judge:
Pursuant to United States Court of International Trade (“CIT”) Rule 12(b), 1 Defendant, the United States, moves to sever and dismiss Count II of Plaintiffs Amended Complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. (Def.’s Mot. to Sever and Dismiss Count II of Pl.’s Compl. (“Def.’s Mot.”) at 1.) Plaintiff asserts that this Court has jurisdiction over Count II of its Amended Complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1581(i). Defendant claims the Court lacks jurisdiction over Plaintiffs claim because, among other reasons, 1) Plaintiff had adequate remedy under 28 U.S.C. § 1581(a),…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Davis v. SchererSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Louise J. Hamlet v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- H & H Wholesale Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
- American National Fire Insurance v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
- Clearon Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2010
- Ad Hoc Utilities Group v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2009
- Alden Leeds, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2010
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.