Legal Opinion

Connor v. Rainwater

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided June 7, 1946No. 15475PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Candler, Justice.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) While the judge, on a hearing of the writ of habeas corpus for a child’s custody, is vested with discretion in determining to whom custody should be given, such discretion should be governed by rules of law and exercised in favor of the party having the legal right, unless the evidence shows that the child’s interest and welfare justify the award of the custody to another, where rivalry between parents as to their child’s custody is not involved. Code, §§ 50-121, 74-107; Butts v. Griffith, 189 Ga. 296 (5 S. E. 2d, 907), and cases cited.

In…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bowers v. Southern Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
  2. Mickle v. MooreSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  3. Eubanks v. BanksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1866
  4. Butts v. GriffithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  5. Perkins v. LevySupreme Court of Georgia · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Stills v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 2000
  2. Campbell v. AllenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951
  3. Hamby v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
  4. Vun Cannon v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952
  5. Touchstone v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API