Legal Opinion

Mickle v. Moore

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided November 12, 1941No. 13912PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Duckworth, Justice.

The first special ground of the motion for a new trial assigns error on the ruling admitting in evidence the following receipt: “January 1, 1933. Deceived of Mrs. G. M. Moore, for labor and overseeing of Mrs. G. M. Moore Estate for 1932, 1240 pounds of lint cotton at six cents per pound — $74.40. [Signed] Henry Moore.” When the receipt was offered in evidence by the plaintiff, counsel for defendants objected on the grounds that it was irrelevant, immaterial, prejudicial, and not binding upon any of the heirs of the Mrs. G. M. Moore estate. The court thereupon ruled that the…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Printup v. MitchellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1855
  2. Bourquin v. BourquinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  3. Citizens & Southern National Bank v. KontzSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
  4. Morris v. WarlickSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  5. Savannah, Florida & Western Railway Co. v. HatcherSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Haslerig v. WatsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
  2. Vaughan v. VaughanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1956
  3. Lumbermen's Underwriting Alliance v. JessupCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
  4. Cone v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
  5. Crosby v. RogersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API