Legal Opinion

Stills v. Johnson

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided July 10, 2000No. S00A0118PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Fletcher, Presiding Justice.

The issue presented by this petition for habeas corpus is the proper standard to be applied in a custody dispute between the paternal grandmother and the maternal uncle of the child, where neither relative is a parent as defined by Georgia law, and the child’s parent has transferred “parental power” to the grandmother pursuant to OCGA § 19-7-1 (b) (l).1 We hold that, in accordance with the development of the law in this state, where two parties seek custody of a child, and neither is a parent of the child, custody is to be governed by the standard of best interest…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Brooks v. ParkersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1995
  2. Waldrup v. CraneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1948
  3. In the Interest of L. F.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
  4. Bailey v. HolmesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
  5. Rawdin v. ConnerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1954

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Clark v. WadeSupreme Court of Georgia · 2001
  2. In the Interest of M. C. L.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  3. In the Interest of T. A. M.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  4. In the Interest of K. W.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  5. In the Interest of D. M. W.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2004

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API