Legal Opinion
Campbell v. Allen
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided July 10, 1951No. 17496, 17497PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Almand, Justice.
We first consider the assignments of error on the exceptions pendente lite, as complained of in the cross-bill of exceptions.
Prior to the adoption of Rule 19 of the Rules of Practice and Procedure for Appeal or Review (Ga. L. 1946, pp. 726, 744; Code, Ann. Supp., § 24-3364), there was no statutory provision or rule of court that gave to the respondent or his counsel in motions for new trial the opportunity to inspect the brief of testimony prepared by counsel for the moving party before approval by the court, nor any notice as to when the same was to be approved by the court,…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Reeves v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Dearing v. Bank of CharlestonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1848
- Martin's Heirs v. MartinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1853
- Peacock v. PeacockSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
- Christopher v. ChristopherSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- CIMARRON INSURANCE CO., INC. v. PaceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1956
- Hobby v. BurkeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
- Flinn v. FlynnSupreme Court of Georgia · 1954
- Keheley v. KoonceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
- King v. SkinnerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.