Legal Opinion
In Re California Micro Devices Securities Litigation
District Court, N.D. California
Decided May 20, 1997No. C-94-2817-VRWPublishedCited by 11 opinions
This document relates to: All Actions.
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
WALKER, District Judge.
The first of these related securities class actions was filed on August 5, 1994, one day after defendant California Micro Devices Corporation (“CAMD”) announced that it had issued materially false financial statements. A number of additional actions were filed over the course of several months as new information emerged concerning the company.
The court issued an order on October 19, 1994, establishing a bidding procedure to be used for selection of class counsel and suggesting that a status conference be held on October 28 or November 3, 1994, to facilitate that…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- 29 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1473, 30 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 33,064 the Officers for Justice, and Jesse J. Byrd v. The Civil Service Commission of the City and County of San Francisco, United States of America v. The City and County of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- In re California Micro Devices Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1996
- Biben v. CardDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1992
3Cited by11 opinions
- In Re: Cendant Corporation LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- Gluck v. CellStar Corp.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1997
- LaSalle Talman Bank, F.S.B. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
- In Re Cendent Corp. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2000
- In re Baan Co. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1999
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.