Legal Opinion

Biben v. Card

District Court, W.D. Missouri

Decided February 25, 1992No. 84-0844-CV-W-6, 84-0846-CV-W-6 and 84-0978-CV-W-6PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

SACHS, Chief Judge.

This class action alleges securities fraud based on Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78j. Defendants Redd and Jallow seek to require absent class members to submit a statement of their claims (the Claims Motion), while Jallow moves to bifurcate the trial into a liability phase and a proof-of-claim phase and to reserve the award of damages to the proof-of-claim phase (the Damages Motion).

The court will first address the Damages Motion. In a securities fraud case, actual damages are measured by calculating the plaintiff’s out-of-pocket…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. ShuttsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Herman & MacLean v. HuddlestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Huddleston v. Herman & MacLeanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  5. Sirota v. Solitron Devices, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re Vivendi Universal, S.A. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
  2. Cotton v. Gaylord ContainerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1997
  3. Waters v. International Precious Metals Corp.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1996
  4. In Re California Micro Devices Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1997
  5. McPhail v. First Command Financial Planning, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API