Legal Opinion
Fight Against Coercive Tactics Network, Inc. v. Coregis Insurance
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided May 31, 1996No. Civil Action 96-K-166PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
KANE, Senior District Judge.
On January 26, 1996, Fight Against Coercive Tactics Network, Inc. (“F.A.C.T.Net”) and its directors, Lawrence Wollersheim, Robert Penny, and Arnaldo Lerma, filed a complaint against Coregis Insurance Company, asserting claims for (1) breach of contract, (2) bad faith or unreasonable breach of insurance contract, and (3) declaratory judgment. On February 26, 1996, Coregis filed an answer to the complaint and a counterclaim for declaratory judgment.
Jurisdiction exists under 28 U.S.C. § 1332 in that Plaintiff F.A.C.T.Net is a Colorado…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Hecla Mining Co. v. New Hampshire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1991
- Chacon v. American Family Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
- Alan C. Gon Jackie Yee David Quan Richard Tsang Gilbert M. Nishimura Ira M. Sako Michael T. Ito Morris Mark v. First State Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- Bernhard v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
- Union Insurance Co. v. HoutzSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Flannery v. Allstate InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1999
- In Re Enron Corp. Securities, DerivativeDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2005
- Religious Technology Center v. F.A.C.T.Net, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1996
- Farmington Casualty Co. v. United Educators Insurance Risk Retention Group, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1999
- Cinergy Corp. v. St. Paul Surplus Lines Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.