Cinergy Corp. v. St. Paul Surplus Lines Insurance Co.
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RILEY, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Appellants-Defendants, Cinergy Corporation, PSI Energy, Inc., and the Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company (collectively, Cinergy) appeal the trial court's Order denying its Motion for Partial Summary Judgment against Appellees-Plaintiffs, St. Paul Surplus Lines Insurance Co., e al. (AEGIS).
We affirm. 1
ISSUE 2
Cinergy raises two issues on appeal, which we consolidate and restate as the following issue: Whether a policyholder of a first-layer liability insurance policy is entitled to payment of defense costs as they are incurred when the insurance poli-ey…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Alan C. Gon Jackie Yee David Quan Richard Tsang Gilbert M. Nishimura Ira M. Sako Michael T. Ito Morris Mark v. First State Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- Kenai Corp. v. National Union Fire Insurance (In Re Kenai Corp.)District Court, S.D. New York · 1992
- Seymour Manufacturing Co. v. Commercial Union Insurance Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1996
- Mid State Bank v. 84 Lumber Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1994
- Jackson v. JonesIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Cinergy Corp. v. Associated Electric & Gas Insurance Services, Ltd.Indiana Supreme Court · 2007
- Travelers Casualty & Surety Co. v. Cincinnati Gas & Electric Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2006