Legal Opinion
Flannery v. Allstate Insurance
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided June 3, 1999No. Civ.A.97-B-210PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
BABCOCK, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Michael Flannery, moves for partial summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56. Defendant Allstate Insurance Company (“Allstate”) moves for determination of questions of law, which I deem a cross-motion for partial summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56. The motions are adequately briefed and the parties presented oral argument on April 30, 1999. For the reasons set forth below, I grant, in part, and deny, in part, both motions. Subject-matter jurisdiction exists under 28 U.S.C. § 1332.
I. FACTS
The following material facts are undisputed…
2Cases cited65 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Buss v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Apartment Investment & Management Co. v. Nutmeg InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- Signature Development Companies, Inc. v. Royal Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Quihuis v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 2014
- K2 Investment Group, LLC v. American Guarantee & Liability InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 2014
- Andrew ex rel. Pretner v. Century Surety Co.District Court, D. Nevada · 2015
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.