Novak v. Levin
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
VERTEFEUILLE, J.
These certified appeals arise from the Appellate Court’s order granting the motions for reconsideration and reconsideration en banc filed by the plaintiff, Irene Novak, thereby restoring her appeal to its docket. On appeal, the defendants, Richard Levin and David McCullough, claim that the Appellate Court, which previously had dismissed the plaintiffs appeal, lacked jurisdiction to grant the plaintiffs motions for reconsideration and reconsideration en banc. We disagree and, accordingly, we affirm the decision of the Appellate Court restoring the plaintiffs appeal to…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- State v. CurcioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Adams v. RubinowSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
- STATE BAR ASSN. v. Connecticut Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
- Connecticut Light & Power Co. v. CostleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Amodio v. AmodioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Burton v. City of StamfordConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Nanni v. Dino Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. CorneliusConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
- HIGHGATE CONDOMINIUM ASS'N, INC. v. MillerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- State v. ArmadoreSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2021
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.