Legal Opinion
United States v. Construction Aggregates Corp.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided March 15, 1983No. Civ. No. 78-10090PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
JAMES HARVEY, District Judge.
Plaintiff, United States Steel Corporation (USSC) brought this action under the Miller Act, 40 U.S.C. § 270a-d (which requires that such a suit be prosecuted in the name of the United States “for the use of” the plaintiff, 40 U.S.C. § 270b(b)) as a subcontractor on a construction contract between the United States and the defendant, Construction Aggregates Corporation (CAC). In this litigation USSC seeks. $1,640,127.53 plus interest and costs which it claims is due and owing for materials supplied to CAC, the prime contractor. CAC has…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- F. D. Rich Co. v. United States Ex Rel. Industrial Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Hi-Way Motor Co. v. International Harvester Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1976
- J. D. Hedin Construction Company, Inc., for Its Own Use and for the Use of Fischbach & Moore, Its Sub-Contractor v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
- WRB Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
- James A. Boyajian, Assignee of Triumph Manufacturing Company, Bankrupt v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Havens Steel Co. v. Randolph Engineering Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1985
- US for Use of US Steel v. Const. AggregatesDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1983