Legal Opinion

US for Use of US Steel v. Const. Aggregates

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided March 15, 1983No. Civ. No. 78-10090PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

559 F.Supp. 414 (1983)

UNITED STATES of America, for the Use of UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION; and United States Steel Corporation, Individually, Plaintiff,

v.

CONSTRUCTION AGGREGATES CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation; and the Travelers Indemnity Company, a Connecticut Corporation, Defendants.

Civ. No. 78-10090.

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, N.D.

March 15, 1983.

Thomas J. Fleischmann, Phillip Allen, Rooks, Pitts, Fullagar & Poust, Chicago, Ill., for plaintiff.

Irwin Zatz, James Barber, Arvey, Hodes, Costello & Burman, Chicago, Ill., for defendant Const. Aggregates Corp.

Richard…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. F. D. Rich Co. v. United States Ex Rel. Industrial Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Hi-Way Motor Co. v. International Harvester Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1976
  3. J. D. Hedin Construction Company, Inc., for Its Own Use and for the Use of Fischbach & Moore, Its Sub-Contractor v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
  4. WRB Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
  5. James A. Boyajian, Assignee of Triumph Manufacturing Company, Bankrupt v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Disner v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
  2. TIJ Materials Corp. v. Green Island Construction Co.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API