Legal Opinion
Miller v. Heller
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 14, 1996No. 90 Civ. 3763, 90 Civ. 4718PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COTE, District Judge:
Plaintiffs filed these actions in 1990 seeking to recover from defendants monies allegedly due under deferred compensation plans entered into by the plaintiffs during their employment at Cluett Peabody & Co, Inc. (“Cluett”). 1 The claims are based on the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001-1145, and common law. On March 13, 1995, the Court issued an Order granting in part defendants’ motion for summary judgment, ruling that the plans at issue were ERISA plans, and dismissing plaintiffs’ claims based on the common law, their claims…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Rexnord Holdings, Inc. v. Maurice BidermannCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Pritzker v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Patrick Demery v. Extebank Deferred Compensation Plan (B)Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- In Re It Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
- Reliable Home Health Care, Inc. v. Union Central InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
- Demery v. Extebank Deferred Compensation PlanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Guiragoss v. KhouryDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2006
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.