Legal Opinion

Nassau-Suffolk Ice Cream, Inc. v. Integrated Resources, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 22, 1987No. 86 Civ. 1766 (MP)PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MILTON POLLACK, Senior District Judge.

There are two dispositive motions against the complaint pending before the Court. The “Integrated” defendants 1 have moved for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and for dismissal for failure to state a claim, under Rule 12(b)(6). The “New Steve’s” defendants 2 have moved for dismissal under Rule 12(b)(6).

Federal jurisdiction over the Integrated defendants is based on three claims asserted under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”), 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961-1968 and on principles of…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Jacobellis v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Gilbert Roeder, Etc. v. Alpha Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
  4. Margaret Morgan and Burton Morgan v. Bank of Waukegan, a Banking CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
  5. Superior Oil Co. v. FulmerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Cullen v. Paine Webber Group, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1988
  2. Federal Paper Bd. Co., Inc. v. AmataDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1988
  3. BAMCO 18 v. ReevesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1987
  4. Lowenbraun v. RothschildDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1988
  5. Newman v. L.F. Rothschild, Unterberg, TowbinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API