Legal Opinion
Newman v. L.F. Rothschild, Unterberg, Towbin
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 28, 1987No. 86 Civ. 3328 (RWS)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Barry and Vivian Newman (the “Newmans”) have moved for reconsideration and reinstatement of their civil RICO complaint against defendants L.F. Rothschild, Unterberg, Towbin (“Rothschild”), and Arthur Levine (“Levine”) and Steven Stark (“Stark”). The RICO count was dismissed in this court’s memorandum opinion of June 30, 1987, 662 F.Supp. 957. However, because the Second Circuit’s decision in Beck v. Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co., 820 F.2d 46 (2d Cir.1987) was issued subsequent to the argument in this case, leave to file supplemental papers on the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Beck v. Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Eliot H. Weisman and Salvatore J. CannatellaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- United States v. IannielloCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Richardson Greenshields Securities, Inc. v. Mui-Hin LauDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- Lowenbraun v. RothschildDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- Babst v. Morgan Keegan & Co.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1988
- Nundy v. Prudential-Bache Securities, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 1991