Legal Opinion
Lowenbraun v. Rothschild
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 25, 1988No. 86 CIV. 2778 (SWK)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KRAM, District Judge.
Plaintiffs sue to recover monies invested in various accounts pursuant to the federal securities laws, 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b) (“section 10(b)” of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934), 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5 (“Rule lobs’’), the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”), 18 U.S.C. § 1961 et seq., and common law fraud. Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint in accordance with this Court’s decision, Lowenbraun v. L.F. Rothschild, No. 86 Civ. 2778 (SWK), slip op. (S.D.N.Y. January 15, 1987) (available on WESTLAW, 1987 WL 5806), which dismissed the RICO claim, one…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. W. J. Howey Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Rolf v. Blyth, Eastman Dillon & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- Spradlin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Beck v. Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Richardson Greenshields Securities, Inc. v. Mui-Hin LauDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- Marini v. AdamoDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2011
- Press v. Chemical Investment Services Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Varnberg v. MinnickDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991
- Beacon Hill CBO II, Ltd. v. Beacon Hill Asset Management LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.