Legal Opinion

Lawrence v. Hartnell Community College District

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 20, 2011No. H035064Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MIHARA, J.

Appellants Gail Lawrence and Sharon Culver sought a writ of administrative mandamus (Code Civ. Proc., § 1085) in the trial court to compel their former employer, respondent Hartnell Community College District (the District), to reinstate them as executive assistants to the District’s superintendent/president or alternatively, to conduct hearings on the propriety of their “demotions, involuntary transfers, and terminations.” The court denied the petition, and appellants challenge that decision on appeal.

*691Appellants contend the court erred when it determined that their temporary…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Burlington Industries, Inc. v. EllerthSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Linda M. Kocsis v. Multi-Care Management, Inc., D/B/A Bath Manor Special Care CentreCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
  4. Ernest L. Crady v. Liberty National Bank and Trust Company of Indiana, Steve Richards, Branch Administrator, and Jack Ragland, Chief Executive OfficerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  5. Skelly v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API