Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of Coffin

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 30, 1937No. Civ. 10484PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpence, Acting P. J.

This is an appeal by the residuary legatees from an order for family allowance.

In 1935, respondent, as the widow of the deceased, petitioned for a family allowance of $750 per month. On April 24, 1935, a written stipulation was filed providing “that the family allowance to the extent and amount of $300.00 per month shall be allowed and paid to said widow under her petition and out of the funds of the estate as and for family allowance and maintenance commencing with the payment of that amount upon the 5th day of May, 1935, for the succeeding month, and continuing at said rate for a period not…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Landers v. WhitneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Estate of GouldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Bidigare v. First National Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Estate of CoffinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. City of Ukiah v. FonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  2. DRG/Beverly Hills, Ltd. v. Chopstix Dim Sum Cafe and Takeout III, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1994
  3. In Re Marriage of VomackaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  4. In Re Marriage of MooreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  5. In Re Marriage of VomackaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API