Legal Opinion
Baird v. City of Fresno
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 3, 1950No. Civ. 4056PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMussell, J.
Action for declaratory relief. Plaintiff in the instant action prays for a judgment determining that he has been duly and regularly retired on a pension by order of the pension board of the city of Fresno, and that in the event it be determined that the action of the pension board was illegal and void, it then be decreed that he is the duly appointed chief engineer of the fire department of the city and entitled to be paid the salary incident to his employment. The judgment of the trial court was for the defendants and plaintiff appeals.
Facts
Plaintiff was appointed a member of the fire…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Kern v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Farrell v. County of PlacerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- O'Dea v. CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- People v. SiemsenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Klench v. Board of Pension Fund CommissionersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Infante v. Tribunal Examinador de Médicos de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1961
- Market Street Railway Co. v. Calalifornia State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Sawyer v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Market St. Ry. Co. v. Cal. St. Bd. Equal.California Court of Appeal · 1955
- Faulkner v. PUBLIC EMPLOYEES'RETIREMENT SYSTEMCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.