Legal Opinion

Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Vinyard

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 27, 1906No. Nos. 5,397 and 5,926PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Erom Gibson Circuit Court; O. M. Welborn, Judge. Action by George Vinyard against the Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company. Erom a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtRoby, J.

The appellee’s complaint was in one paragraph. He avers that he was the owner of a barn situated near the line of appellant’s railroad, and that it so negligently operated one of its engines that sparks of fire were thrown from said engine into or upon said barn, setting fire to and destroying it, to his damage. The averment of negligence is: “That said sparks of fire and burning cinders were emitted from said engine on the date aforesaid, either by the defective condition of said engine on the date aforesaid, or by the defective construction of said engine, or by the careless and negligent…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hines v. DriverIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Davis v. DavisIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Pemberton v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railroad v. McKeehanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892
  5. Crumrine v. Estate of CrumrineIndiana Court of Appeals · 1896

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jones v. KolmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912
  2. Payne v. LarterIndiana Court of Appeals · 1907
  3. Starke County Trust, Etc., Bank, Admr. v. HobartIndiana Court of Appeals · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API