Legal Opinion

Pemberton v. Johnson

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1888No. 13,061PublishedCited by 11 opinions

From the Grant Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtZollars, J.

Appellee brought this action to recover a judgment upon a promissory note, and to foreclose a mortgage given to secure its payment.

The note was executed by appellant Elihu W. Pemberton. The mortgage was executed by him and his wife, and co-appellant, Arcadia Pemberton, upon real estate which he then owned. Subsequently the réal estate was conveyed to the wife in payment of a debt which the husband owed her.

The overruling of appellants’ motion for a new trial is assigned as error.

It is contended by appellants that the finding and judgment of the court below are not sustained by sufficient…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hines v. DriverIndiana Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Morrison v. CareyIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Bartley v. PhillipsIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Gish v. GishIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
  4. Cheek v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Working v. GarnIndiana Supreme Court · 1897

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API