Legal Opinion

Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railroad v. McKeehan

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided September 13, 1892No. 570PublishedCited by 9 opinions

From the Vermillion Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtCrumpacker, J.

McKeehan obtained a judgment against the railroad company at the March term, 1891, of the Vermillion Circuit Court, for damages for the killing of'two horses, and after the final adjournment of said court for said term, the company filed its complaint for a new trial on the ground of newly-discovered evidence, under section 563, R. S. 1881. Affidavits of the newly-discovered witnesses were filed with the complaint showing the facts to which they would testify; also affidavits upon the question of diligence upon the part of the company in attempting to procure the evidence before the trial.

A…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hines v. DriverIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Beers v. FlockIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Donahue v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  2. East v. McKeeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895
  3. Hartig v. StratmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. Bertram v. State, ex rel. Lowell Dredge Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1904
  5. McKernan v. EstabrookIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API