Legal Opinion

Maaskant v. Matsui

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 27, 1942No. Civ. 2676PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHOTTKY, J. pro tem.

Defendants appeal from a judgment entered on a verdict rendered against them in an action for the death of Harry Maaskant, arising out of an automobile accident in which an automobile operated by said deceased collided with an automobile owned by appellants Shinagawa and Matsui and operated by appellant Matsui. Appellant M. D. Hopper was named as a co-defendant and judgment was entered against said appellant upon the theory that at the time of the fatal accident appellant George Matsui was an employee and agent of appellant Hopper, and appellant Hopper was therefore…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Treadwell v. NickelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Bancroft-Whitney Co. v. McHughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Westberg v. WilldeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Mar Shee v. Maryland Assurance Corp.California Supreme Court · 1922

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. HoneycuttCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  2. State v. ByrdArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Laird v. T. W. Mather, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Laird v. T. W. Mather, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1958
  5. People v. HoneycuttCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API