Legal Opinion
Michel v. Louisville & N. R. Co
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided May 23, 1951No. 13303PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RUSSELL, Circuit Judge.
The appellant Michel instituted suit against the appellee, Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company, alleging that his discharge from employment by the appellee was an unjustified breach of an employment contract entered into by him with the railroad through his representative, the Brotherhood of Railway and Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express and Station employees. He especially plead and relied upon Rule 19(a) of the contract of employment. 1 It was also alleged that by reason of failure to give the notice provided, the prosecution of the charge had become…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Co. v. BurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Slocum v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Moore v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Order of Railway Conductors of America v. PitneySupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Co. v. BurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1946
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Union Pacific Railroad v. PriceSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- William v. Ficek v. Southern Pacific Company, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- Bower v. Eastern Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954
- Derlyn E. Moe v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
- Belford Barnett v. Pennsylvania-Reading Seashare LinesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1957
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.