Legal Opinion
D'AMICO v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 9, 1961PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WEINFELD, District Judge.
The plaintiff, an employee of the defendant Railroad, moves to enjoin it and the individual defendants, its hearing officers, from proceeding with a disciplinary trial upon charges of alleged violation of the Company rules. Plaintiff concedes the defendants’ right to conduct such proceedings and also acknowledges that in the event of an adverse ruling, his remedy is to appeal to the National Railroad Adjustment Board, as provided by the Railway Labor Act of 1934, 45 U.S. C.A. § 153, First (i).
The sole basis of plaintiff’s appeal to this Court is that the defendants…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Steele v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Co. v. BurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Chicago River & Indiana RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Slocum v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Order of Railway Conductors of America v. PitneySupreme Court of the United States · 1946
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Edwards v. St. Louis-San Francisco RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1966
- John P. McElroy v. Terminal Railroad Association of St. Louis, a Corporation, and Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers, Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1968
- J. W. Edwards v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1966
- Barrett v. Manufacturers Railway Co.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1966
- Del Casal v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1979