Legal Opinion

Schoettle v. Sarkes Tarzian, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 3, 1958No. Civ. A. No. 24767PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEAHY, District Judge.

Plaintiff started suit against the corporate and individual defendants in the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County. The sheriff’s return as to the individual defendants shows they were served “by handing a true and attested copy of the within complaint at Erie Avenue and K Streets, in the County of Philadelphia, State of Pennsylvania in the place of business of said defendant to Mrs. Keely, the person for the time being in charge thereof who stated that her relationship to said defendant is that of clerk being unable to ascertain the residence of said defendant…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Pulson v. American Rolling Mill Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1948

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Insull v. New York World-Telegram CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1959
  2. Giordani v. HoffmannDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1969
  3. Maternity Trousseau, Inc. v. Maternity Mart of Baltimore, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1961
  4. Schoettle v. Sarkes Tarzian, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API