Legal Opinion
Insull v. New York World-Telegram Corporation
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided April 8, 1959No. 58 C 108, 58 C 150, 58 C 151PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MINER, District Judge.
These are three actions to recover compensatory and punitive damages for alleged libels published by ten corporate and twelve individual defendants. They were originally filed as one action in the Circuit Court of Cook County on December 30, 1957 (Law No. 57 C 18759), and subsequently removed to this Court by defendants pursuant to 28 U.S.C. (1952 ed.) § 1441.
Plaintiff is an Illinois resident. No defendant is a resident of Illinois. One corporate defendant (Houghton Mifflin Company) is licensed to do business in Illinois, and service was had on its registered agent in…
2Cases cited118 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
113 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Tom Olesker's Exciting World of Fashion, Inc. v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1975
- William F. Buckley, Jr. v. New York Post CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
- Baker v. MillerIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
- Woodring v. HallSupreme Court of Kansas · 1968
- Samuel Insull v. New York, World-Telegram Corporation, a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1959
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.