Legal Opinion

Schoettle v. Sarkes Tarzian, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided January 10, 1961No. Civ. A. 24767PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

VAN DUSEN, District Judge.

This action is one for commissions allegedly due under an oral contract of exclusive agency whereby plaintiff was engaged to find a purchaser of the stock or assets of defendant corporation.

The suit, which was originally instituted in the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County, was removed to this court under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1446. The individual defendants, Sarkes and Mary M. Tarzian, filed Motions to Quash the Sheriff’s Return of Service as to them (Documents Nos. 3, 4, 6, 7), which motions were granted D.C., 167 F.Supp. 172 (Documents Nos. 9 and 10). After some…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Zimmerman v. ZehendnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Alford v. RaschiatoreSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  3. Monongahela Bridge Co. v. Pittsburg & Birmingham Traction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
  4. New Wrinkle, Inc. v. John L. Armitage & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956
  5. Selvage v. TalbottIndiana Supreme Court · 1911

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Irving B. Gruber v. Owens-Illinois Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API