Legal Opinion

Deisher v. Kansas Department of Transportation

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 24, 1998No. 78,725PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Lockett, J.:

Plaintiffs filed an inverse condemnation action against the Kansas Department of Transportation (KDOT) alleging a loss of water to their well was caused by KDOT’s actions. The district court found that plaintiffs’ proper remedy was in tort rather than in inverse condemnation and granted summary judgment to KDOT. Plaintiffs appealed, claiming the district court erred in ruling that the plaintiffs could not bring an inverse condemnation action. The case was transferred from the Court of Appeals pursuant to K.S.A. 20-3018(c).

In 1982, the State…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Carroll v. KittleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969
  2. Memorial Hospital Ass'n, Inc. v. KnutsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1986
  3. Heins Implement Co. v. Missouri Highway & Transportation CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  4. Kerns Ex Rel. Kerns v. G.A.C., Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1994
  5. Brock v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1965

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Korytkowski v. City of OttawaSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  2. Miller v. BartleSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  3. Butler County Rural Water District No. 8 v. YatesSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003
  4. Buhmann v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Estate of Kirkpatrick v. City of OlatheSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API