Legal Opinion

Miller v. Bartle

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 2, 2007No. 95,418PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Davis, J.:

Amy and James Bartle (the Bartles) appeal from a jury award in an eminent domain proceeding initiated by the Kansas Department of Transportation (KDOT) for the partial taking of their property for a highway improvement project in Douglas County, Kansas. They do not appeal the juiy determination of the fair market value of the property taken, but claim on appeal that they have been denied equal protection and due process of law under the United States Constitution. They base their claim upon legislation authorizing a payment of 125 percent to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Board of Lincoln County Comm'rs v. NielanderSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003
  2. Unified School District No. 233 v. Kansas Ass'n of American EducatorsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003
  3. Sutton v. FrazierSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958
  4. Urban Renewal Agency v. DeckerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1966
  5. Deisher v. Kansas Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Kansas · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Bussman v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
  2. Harsch v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  3. Shipe v. Public Wholesale Water Supply District No. 25Supreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  4. In Re the Care & Treatment of MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  5. Miller v. GLACIER DEVELOPMENT CO., LLCSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API