H.L. Smith, Inc. v. John H. Dalton, Secretary of the Navy
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
RADER, Circuit Judge.
H.L. Smith, Inc. submitted several requests for equitable adjustments and time extensions under its Government contract. The contracting officer declined to issue final decisions on Smith’s submissions. Smith appealed the deemed denials to the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals. The Board dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. H.L. Smith, Inc., 94-2 B.C.A. (CCH) ¶26,-723, 1994 WL 55629 (1994). Because Smith submitted proper claims under the Contract Disputes Act of 1978 (CDA), 41 U.S.C. §§ 601-613 (1988 & Supp. V 1993), the Board has jurisdiction over Smith’s appeals.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Contract Cleaning Maintenance, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Transamerica Insurance Corporation, Inc., for and on Behalf of Stroup Sheet Metal Works v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- W.M. Schlosser Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Tecom, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Essex Electro Engineers, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
3Cited by35 opinions
- Todd Construction, L.P. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- North Star Alaska Housing Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- UMC Electronics Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
- Laguna Construction Company v. DefenseCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- United Aeronautical Corp. v. UsafCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.