Legal Opinion
Albert and Harlow Inc. v. Great Northern Oil Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided April 18, 1969No. 41092PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Sheran, Justice.
Appeal by American Oil Company from an order of the district court denying its motion for amended findings or in the alternative, for a new trial.
Respondent, Great Northern Oil Company, a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in Dakota County, refines petroleum and its byproducts. In April 1964, it contracted with Pipeline Technologists, Inc., to plan, design, and supervise the construction of a pipeline to be used for transporting petroleum products from Great Northern’s refinery near Pine Bend, Minnesota, to a terminal at Junction City, Wisconsin.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Title Insurance & Trust Co. v. California Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
- Johnson v. StarrettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Reuben E. Johnson Co. v. PhelpsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
- M. E. Kraft Excavating & Grading Co. v. Barac Construction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
- Emery v. HertigSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Premier Bank v. BECKER DEVELOPMENT, LLCSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- Eclipse Architectural Group, Inc. v. LamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- Guillaume & Associates, Inc. v. Don-John Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Minnesota Wood Specialties, Inc. v. MattsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- James Cape & Sons Co. v. Bowles (In Re Bowles)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.