Paine & Nixon Co. v. Dahlvick
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for St. Louis county. The court, Dancer, J., ordered judgment in favor of defendant Grande for $91.68, of which sum $58.87 was declared a specific lien upon the premises described in the complaint. His motion for amended findings was denied. From the judgment entered pursuant to the order for judgment, defendant Grande appealed.
1Opinion of the Court
Dibell, C.
Action to enforce a mechanic’s lien. Judgment was entered for the defendant Grande against the defendant Dahlvick for $91.68, of which $58.87 was adjudged a lien upon specific property. Grande appeals. His claim is that all of the $91.68 should have been adjudged a lien.
The defendant Anderson was the owner of a lot and building in Virginia. He was making some changes. Dahlvick had the contract for putting in a new front for $350. This contract was completed as early as October 14, 1914, and Dahlvick was paid. Of the material furnished by Grande $32.81 worth was furnished in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Northwestern Lumber & Wrecking Co. v. ParkerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Frankoviz v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
- American Bridge Co. v. HonstainSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- Fitzpatrick v. ErnstSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
- Northwestern Lumber & Wrecking Co. v. ParkerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
3Cited by14 opinions
- Botsford Lumber Co. v. SchriverSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1925
- Hot Springs Plumbing & Heating Co. v. WallaceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1933
- Barrett v. HampeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
- New Prague Lumber & Readi-Mix Co. v. BastyrSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
- Carr-Cullen Co. v. CooperSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.