Legal Opinion

Consolidated American Insurance Co. v. Anderson

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided November 21, 1997No. 96-CA-3065-MRPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ABRAMSON, Judge.

Consolidated American Insurance Company (“Consolidated”) appeals from a judgment requiring it to provide coverage for a vehicle which was not listed as a “covered auto” in a commercial automobile insurance policy issued to Appellee Charles Dwain Anderson (“Anderson”). In concluding that the policy must be construed as affording coverage for a vehicle not owned or operated by Anderson but used by one of his employees for business purposes, the trial judge found the “covered auto” provision in question analogous to the type of exclusionary language our Supreme Court…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bishop v. Allstate Insurance Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Simon v. Continental Insurance Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Beacon Insurance Co. of America v. State Farm Mutual Insurance Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Estate of Swartz v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1997
  5. Brown v. Atlanta Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. True v. RainesKentucky Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Travelers Property Casualty Co. of America v. Hillerich & Bradsby Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
  3. York v. Kentucky Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Hiscox Dedicated Corporate Member Ltd. v. WilsonDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2003
  5. Travelers Property Casualty Co v. Hillerich & Bradsby, Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API