Legal Opinion

Estate of Swartz v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty Co.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided August 1, 1997No. 96-CA-0664-MRPublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ABRAMSON, Judge:

The sole issue presented in this case of first impression is whether an insured may aggregate or “stack” underinsured motorist coverage under a policy which, while ostensibly charging a single premium for that protection, in fact bases the premium on whether the policy covers a single vehicle or multiple vehicles. The Estate of Judith H. Swartz (the “Estate”) challenges a judgment of the Jefferson Circuit Court concluding that her insurer, Metropolitan Property & Casualty Company (“Metropolitan”), is not required to stack underinsured motorist (UIM) benefits for the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Gov. Emp. Ins. Co. v. BrownMississippi Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Simon v. Continental Insurance Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Ohio Casualty Insurance Co. v. StanfieldKentucky Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Meridian Mutual Insurance Company v. SiddonsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1970
  5. Chaffin v. Kentucky Farm Bureau Insurance CompaniesKentucky Supreme Court · 1990

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Pennington v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
  2. Montano v. Allstate Indemnity Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Sparks v. Trustguard Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 2012
  4. Meyers v. Kentucky Medical Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1997
  5. Burton v. Farm Bureau Insurance Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2003

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API