Estate of Swartz v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty Co.
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ABRAMSON, Judge:
The sole issue presented in this case of first impression is whether an insured may aggregate or “stack” underinsured motorist coverage under a policy which, while ostensibly charging a single premium for that protection, in fact bases the premium on whether the policy covers a single vehicle or multiple vehicles. The Estate of Judith H. Swartz (the “Estate”) challenges a judgment of the Jefferson Circuit Court concluding that her insurer, Metropolitan Property & Casualty Company (“Metropolitan”), is not required to stack underinsured motorist (UIM) benefits for the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Gov. Emp. Ins. Co. v. BrownMississippi Supreme Court · 1984
- Simon v. Continental Insurance Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1986
- Ohio Casualty Insurance Co. v. StanfieldKentucky Supreme Court · 1979
- Meridian Mutual Insurance Company v. SiddonsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1970
- Chaffin v. Kentucky Farm Bureau Insurance CompaniesKentucky Supreme Court · 1990
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Pennington v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- Montano v. Allstate Indemnity Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2004
- Sparks v. Trustguard Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 2012
- Meyers v. Kentucky Medical Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1997
- Burton v. Farm Bureau Insurance Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2003
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.